Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 M395X outperforms GeForce GT 620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 M395X is 1085 days newer than GeForce GT 620.
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 M395X
- Performs up to 13% better in Rust than GeForce GT 620 - 93 vs 82 FPS
- Up to 700% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GT 620 - 8 vs 1 GB
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GT 620
- Consumes up to 35% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 M395X - 49 vs 75 Watts
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Radeon R9 M395X
Mobile • May 5th, 2015
GeForce GT 620
Desktop • May 15th, 2012
Theoretical Performance
Radeon R9 M395X
Mobile • May 5th, 2015
Pixel Fillrate
23.14 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
92.54 GTexel/s
100%
AMD Radeon R9 M395X | vs | NVIDIA GeForce GT 620 |
|---|---|---|
May 5th, 2015 | Release Date | May 15th, 2012 |
| Crystal System | Generation | GeForce 600 |
| Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
| None | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
| None | Power Connectors | None |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
8 GB | Memory | 1 GB |
| GDDR5 | Type | DDR3 |
| 256-bit | Bus | 64-bit |
160 GB/s | Bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s |
723 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 700 MHz |
| Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
1250 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 900 MHz |
