Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 295X2 outperforms GeForce GT 620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 295X2 is 714 days newer than GeForce GT 620.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GT 620
- Consumes up to 90% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 295X2 - 49 vs 500 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 295X2
- Performs up to 62% better in Borderlands 3 than GeForce GT 620 - 68 vs 42 FPS
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GT 620 - 4 vs 1 GB
Borderlands 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
GeForce GT 620
Desktop • May 15th, 2012
Radeon R9 295X2
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2014
Theoretical Performance
GeForce GT 620
Desktop • May 15th, 2012
Pixel Fillrate
2.8 GPixel/s
4.29777436684574%
Texel Fillrate
11.2 GTexel/s
6.25%
Radeon R9 295X2
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
65.15 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
179.2 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 620 | vs | AMD Radeon R9 295X2 |
|---|---|---|
| May 15th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2014 |
| GeForce 600 | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | $1499 |
| 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | Outputs | 1x DVI, 4x mini-DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 3x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 1 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
| DDR3 | Type | GDDR5 |
| 64-bit | Bus | 512-bit |
| 14.4 GB/s | Bandwidth | 320 GB/s |
| 700 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1018 MHz |
| Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
| 900 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1250 MHz |
