Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1660 Ti outperforms Radeon R9 390 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is 1345 days newer than Radeon R9 390.
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 390
- Up to 33% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti - 8 vs 6 GB
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
- Performs up to 24% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Radeon R9 390 - 83 vs 67 FPS
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 390 - 120 vs 275 Watts
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for €566.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 169 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jun 18th, 2015
Desktop • Feb 22nd, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Jun 18th, 2015
Pixel Fillrate
64 GPixel/s
75.32956685499059%
Texel Fillrate
160 GTexel/s
94.17304296645085%
Desktop • Feb 22nd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
84.96 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
169.9 GTexel/s
100%
AMD Radeon R9 390 | vs | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti |
---|---|---|
Jun 18th, 2015 | Release Date | Feb 22nd, 2019 |
Pirate Islands | Generation | GeForce 16 |
$329 | MSRP | $279 |
2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | Power Connectors | 1x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 GB | Memory | 6 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR6 |
512-bit | Bus | 192-bit |
384 GB/s | Bandwidth | 288 GB/s |
1000 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |
Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 1770 MHz |
1500 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |