Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1660 Ti outperforms the cheaper Radeon PRO W7500 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is 1623 days older than the cheaper Radeon PRO W7500.
Advantages of AMD Radeon PRO W7500
- Up to 16% cheaper than GeForce GTX 1660 Ti - €476.76 vs €566.21
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti - 70 vs 120 Watts
- Up to 33% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti - 8 vs 6 GB
Tom Clancy’s The Division 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €566.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11 minutes ago
Buy for €476.76 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Feb 22nd, 2019
Desktop • Aug 3rd, 2023
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Feb 22nd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
84.96 GPixel/s
78.08823529411765%
Texel Fillrate
169.9 GTexel/s
89.23319327731093%
Desktop • Aug 3rd, 2023
Pixel Fillrate
108.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
190.4 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | vs | AMD Radeon PRO W7500 |
---|---|---|
Feb 22nd, 2019 | Release Date | Aug 3rd, 2023 |
GeForce 16 | Generation | Radeon Pro Navi |
$279 | MSRP | $429 |
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | Outputs | 4x DisplayPort 2.1 |
1x 8-pin | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 GB | Memory | 8 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | GDDR6 |
192-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
288 GB/s | Bandwidth | 172 GB/s |
1500 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |
1770 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1700 MHz |
1500 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1344 MHz |