Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 290 outperforms Arc A310 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 290 is 3263 days older than Arc A310.
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 290
- Performs up to 8% better in Battlefield V than Arc A310 - 112 vs 104 FPS
Advantages of Intel Arc A310
- Consumes up to 89% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 290 - 30 vs 275 Watts
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €138.48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3436 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2013
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2022
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2013
Pixel Fillrate
60.61 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
151.5 GTexel/s
100%
AMD Radeon R9 290 | vs | Intel Arc A310 |
---|---|---|
Nov 5th, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2022 |
Volcanic Islands | Generation | Alchemist |
$399 | MSRP | Not Available |
2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | Outputs | 4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0 |
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR6 |
512-bit | Bus | 64-bit |
320 GB/s | Bandwidth | 124 GB/s |
947 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1750 MHz |
Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 1750 MHz |
1250 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1937 MHz |