Key Differences
In short — Radeon Pro WX 3200 outperforms Radeon R7 250 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon Pro WX 3200 is 2093 days newer than Radeon R7 250.
Advantages of AMD Radeon R7 250
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 - 55 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200
- Performs up to 27% better in Hogwarts Legacy than Radeon R7 250 - 19 vs 15 FPS
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R7 250 - 4 vs 1 GB
Hogwarts Legacy
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €131.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 326 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013
Pixel Fillrate
14.8 GPixel/s
71.42857142857144%
Texel Fillrate
29.6 GTexel/s
71.42857142857144%
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
20.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
41.44 GTexel/s
100%
AMD Radeon R7 250 | vs | AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 |
---|---|---|
Oct 8th, 2013 | Release Date | Jul 2nd, 2019 |
Volcanic Islands | Generation | Radeon Pro |
Not Available | MSRP | $199 |
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | Outputs | 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
1 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
DDR3 | Type | GDDR5 |
128-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
28.8 GB/s | Bandwidth | 96 GB/s |
925 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1295 MHz |
Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
900 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |