Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1050 Ti outperforms the cheaper Radeon Pro WX 3200 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Radeon Pro WX 3200 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing GeForce GTX 1050 Ti is 980 days older than the cheaper Radeon Pro WX 3200.
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200
- Up to 44% cheaper than GeForce GTX 1050 Ti - €139.99 vs €249.9
- Up to 34% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than GeForce GTX 1050 Ti - €5.0 vs €7.57 per FPS
- Consumes up to 13% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti - 65 vs 75 Watts
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
- Performs up to 18% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Radeon Pro WX 3200 - 33 vs 28 FPS
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2019
FPS
28
84%
Value, €/FPS
€5/FPS
100%
Price, €
€139.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €139.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 104 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
FPS
33
100%
Value, €/FPS
€7.57/FPS
66%
Price, €
€249.9
56%
FPS Winner
Buy for €249.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 104 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2019
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
20.72 GPixel/s
46%
Texel Fillrate
41.44 GTexel/s
62%
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Pixel Fillrate
44.54 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
66.82 GTexel/s
100%
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 | vs | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti |
---|---|---|
Jul 2nd, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 25th, 2016 |
Radeon Pro | Generation | GeForce 10 |
$199 | MSRP | $139 |
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR5 |
128-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
96 GB/s | Bandwidth | 112.1 GB/s |
1295 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1291 MHz |
Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 1392 MHz |
1500 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1752 MHz |