Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1650 outperforms Radeon Pro 5500M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 1650 is 204 days older than Radeon Pro 5500M.
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro 5500M
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 - 8 vs 4 GB
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
- Performs up to 12% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Radeon Pro 5500M - 9 vs 8 FPS
- Consumes up to 12% less energy than AMD Radeon Pro 5500M - 75 vs 85 Watts
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
9
100%
Value, €/FPS
€18.71/FPS
100%
Price, €
€168.39
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €168.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 693 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Mobile • Nov 13th, 2019
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Mobile • Nov 13th, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
46.4 GPixel/s
87%
Texel Fillrate
139.2 GTexel/s
100%
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
66%
AMD Radeon Pro 5500M | vs | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 |
---|---|---|
Nov 13th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Radeon Pro Mac | Generation | GeForce 16 |
Not Available | MSRP | $149 |
None | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
8 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | GDDR5 |
128-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
192 GB/s | Bandwidth | 128.1 GB/s |
1000 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1485 MHz |
1450 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1665 MHz |
1500 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2001 MHz |