Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900K outperforms Xeon w9-3495X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-14900K is 244 days newer than Xeon w9-3495X.
Advantages of Xeon w9-3495X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-14900K - 112 vs 32 threads
Advantages of Core i9-14900K
- Performs up to 12% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Xeon w9-3495X - 225 vs 201 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon w9-3495X doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
225
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.93/FPS
100%
Price, £
£433.5
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £433.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 172 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Server/Workstation • Feb 15th, 2023
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon w9-3495X | vs | Core i9-14900K |
---|---|---|
Feb 15th, 2023 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Xeon W | Collection | Core i9 |
Sapphire Rapids | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 4677 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
56 | Cores | 24 |
112 | Threads | 32 |
1.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | Not Available |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |