Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 5950X outperforms Xeon w9-3495X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 5950X is 832 days older than Xeon w9-3495X.
Advantages of Xeon w9-3495X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 9 5950X - 112 vs 32 threads
Advantages of Ryzen 9 5950X
- Performs up to 2% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Xeon w9-3495X - 146 vs 143 FPS
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FPS
146
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.92/FPS
100%
Price, £
£279.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £279.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6895 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Server/Workstation • Feb 15th, 2023
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon w9-3495X | vs | Ryzen 9 5950X |
---|---|---|
Feb 15th, 2023 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
Xeon W | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Sapphire Rapids | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket 4677 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
56 | Cores | 16 |
112 | Threads | 32 |
1.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 105 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |