Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 5700 outperforms Xeon W3520 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 5700 is 4753 days newer than Xeon W3520.
Advantages of Ryzen 7 5700
- Performs up to 25% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Xeon W3520 - 143 vs 114 FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Xeon W3520 - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon W3520 - 16 vs 8 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Apr 4th, 2022
FPS
143
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.88/FPS
100%
Price, £
£126.47
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £126.47 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6525 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Server/Workstation • Mar 30th, 2009
Desktop • Apr 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon W3520 | vs | Ryzen 7 5700 |
---|---|---|
Mar 30th, 2009 | Release Date | Apr 4th, 2022 |
Xeon | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Bloomfield | Codename | Not Available |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
2.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 65 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |