Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3600 outperforms Xeon Gold 5317 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 3600 is 639 days older than Xeon Gold 5317.
Advantages of Xeon Gold 5317
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 3600 - 24 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Ryzen 5 3600
- Performs up to 9% better in Starfield than Xeon Gold 5317 - 61 vs 56 FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Xeon Gold 5317 - 65 vs 150 Watts
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
61
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.66/FPS
100%
Price, £
£101.02
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £101.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 123 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Apr 6th, 2021
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon Gold 5317 | vs | Ryzen 5 3600 |
---|---|---|
Apr 6th, 2021 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Xeon Gold | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Ice Lake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 4189 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 6 |
24 | Threads | 12 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
150 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |