Buy on Amazon
£552.48
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP $449
Availability
MSRP $449
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 7800X3D outperforms Xeon E5-2687W v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 7800X3D is 3412 days newer than Xeon E5-2687W v2.
Advantages of Ryzen 7 7800X3D
- Performs up to 236% better in Immortals of Aveum than Xeon E5-2687W v2 - 94 vs 28 FPS
- Consumes up to 20% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2687W v2 - 120 vs 150 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2687W v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
94
100%
Value, £/FPS
£5.88/FPS
100%
Price, £
£552.48
100%
FPS and Value Winner
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D CPU AM5 4.2GHz (5.0 Turbo) 8-Core 120W 104MB Cache 5nm 7th Gen Radeon Graphics NO HEATSINK/FAN - 100-100000910WOF
Buy for £552.48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 225 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-2687W v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2687W v2 | vs | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raphael |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 8 | Cores | 8 |
| 16 | Threads | 16 |
| 3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
| 150 W | TDP | 120 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
| 34.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
| No | Overclockable | No |
PCs Using Xeon E5-2687W v2 or Ryzen 7 7800X3D
With selected game settings
50 FPS
£39/FPS
32 GB, 2 TB SSD
Buy on Amazon
£1,949.94
In Stock
58 FPS
£29.31/FPS
64 GB, N/A Storage
Buy on Amazon
£1,699.99
In Stock
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
