Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 5600GT outperforms Xeon E5-2687W v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 5600GT is 3781 days newer than Xeon E5-2687W v2.
Advantages of Xeon E5-2687W v2
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 5600GT - 16 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Ryzen 5 5600GT
- Performs up to 9% better in ARK: Survival Evolved than Xeon E5-2687W v2 - 128 vs 117 FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2687W v2 - 65 vs 150 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2687W v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Xeon E5-2687W v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Ryzen 5 5600GT
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2687W v2 | vs | Ryzen 5 5600GT |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Not Available |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 12 |
| 3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
| 150 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 34.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 7 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
