Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 5900X outperforms Xeon E5-2620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 5900X is 3166 days newer than Xeon E5-2620.
Advantages of Xeon E5-2620
- Consumes up to 10% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 5900X - 95 vs 105 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 9 5900X
- Performs up to 18% better in Elden Ring than Xeon E5-2620 - 130 vs 110 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2620 - 24 vs 12 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FPS
130
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.58/FPS
100%
Price, £
£204.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £204.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7299 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2620 | vs | Ryzen 9 5900X |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 12 |
12 | Threads | 24 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
2.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 105 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |