Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms Xeon E5-2620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 3956 days newer than Xeon E5-2620.
Advantages of Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 28% better in Resident Evil 4 than Xeon E5-2620 - 198 vs 155 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2620 - 16 vs 12 threads
Resident Evil 4
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Xeon E5-2620
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Core i5-13400F
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2620 | vs | Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 6 | Cores | 10 |
| 12 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
| 2.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
