Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 5800X outperforms Xeon E5-2620 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 5800X is 2622 days newer than Xeon E5-2620 v2.
Advantages of Xeon E5-2620 v2
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 5800X - 80 vs 105 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 7 5800X
- Performs up to 65% better in Starfield than Xeon E5-2620 v2 - 71 vs 43 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2 - 16 vs 12 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-2620 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Ryzen 7 5800X
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2620 v2 | vs | Ryzen 7 5800X |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
| Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Vermeer |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 6 | Cores | 8 |
| 12 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| 2.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 105 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 21.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
