In Battlefield 6, the Xeon E5-2620 v2 is much slower than the Ryzen 5 7600X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E5-2620 v2
- Consumes up to 24% less energy – 80 vs 105 Watts
- Consumes up to 24% less energy
Ryzen 5 7600X
- Up to 103% faster in Battlefield 6 – 124 vs 61 FPS
- Up to 103% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 9 years and 25 days newer – Sep 27, 2022 vs Sep 01, 2013
- Is 9 years and 25 days newer
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Xeon E5-2620 v2 vs Ryzen 5 7600X: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Ryzen 5 7600X
Sep 27th, 2022
Average FPS
124 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
93 FPS
100%
Price, $
$179.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.45/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5-2620 v2 vs Ryzen 5 7600X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5-2620 v2 vs Ryzen 5 7600X in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5-2620 v2
Sep 1st, 2013
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
15 MB
47%
Base Frequency
2.1 GHz
45%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Ryzen 5 7600X
Sep 27th, 2022
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
32 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5-2620 v2 Sep 1st, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 5 7600X Sep 27th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Released | Sep 27th, 2022 |
| – | MSRP | $299.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2011 | Socket | AM5 |
80 W | Power Consumption | 105 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 5200 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | Radeon Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
