Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900KF outperforms Xeon E5-2440 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-12900KF is 2986 days newer than Xeon E5-2440 v2.
Advantages of Xeon E5-2440 v2
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900KF - 95 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Core i9-12900KF
- Performs up to 146% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Xeon E5-2440 v2 - 524 vs 213 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2440 v2 - 24 vs 16 threads
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
524
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.5/FPS
100%
Price, £
£260.26
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £260.26 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 98 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2440 v2 | vs | Core i9-12900KF |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge EN | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1356 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 16 |
16 | Threads | 24 |
1.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
2.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |