Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7900X outperforms Xeon E3-1265L v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7900X is 3788 days newer than Xeon E3-1265L v2.
Advantages of Xeon E3-1265L v2
- Consumes up to 74% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7900X - 45 vs 170 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7900X
- Performs up to 48% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Xeon E3-1265L v2 - 163 vs 110 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1265L v2 - 24 vs 8 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
163
100%
Value, £/FPS
£5.7/FPS
100%
Price, £
£929.89
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £929.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 160 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E3-1265L v2 | vs | Ryzen 9 7900X |
---|---|---|
May 14th, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 170 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 47.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |