In Battlefield 6, the Xeon E3-1265L v2 is quite a bit slower than the Ryzen 7 5800X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E3-1265L v2
- Consumes up to 57% less energy – 45 vs 105 Watts
- Consumes up to 57% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Ryzen 7 5800X
- Up to 63% faster in Battlefield 6 – 101 vs 62 FPS
- Up to 63% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 8 years and 5 months newer – Nov 05, 2020 vs May 14, 2012
- Is 8 years and 5 months newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Xeon E3-1265L v2 vs Ryzen 7 5800X: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Ryzen 7 5800X
Nov 5th, 2020
Average FPS
101 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
76 FPS
100%
Price, $
$204.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.02/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E3-1265L v2 vs Ryzen 7 5800X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E3-1265L v2 vs Ryzen 7 5800X in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E3-1265L v2
May 14th, 2012
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
8 MB
25%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
66%
Turbo Frequency
3.5 GHz
74%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Ryzen 7 5800X
Nov 5th, 2020
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
32 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E3-1265L v2 May 14th, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 7 5800X Nov 5th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| May 14th, 2012 | Released | Nov 5th, 2020 |
| – | MSRP | $449.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1155 | Socket | AM4 |
45 W | Power Consumption | 105 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4) |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
