Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms Xeon E3-1240 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 4294 days newer than Xeon E3-1240.
Advantages of Xeon E3-1240
- Consumes up to 33% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D - 80 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- Performs up to 22% better in DOOM Eternal than Xeon E3-1240 - 556 vs 455 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1240 - 32 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1240 doesn't have integrated graphics
DOOM Eternal
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
556
100%
Value, £/FPS
£2.12/FPS
100%
Price, £
£1179.89
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £1,179.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 266 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E3-1240 | vs | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 120 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |