Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12600KF outperforms Xeon E3-1240 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-12600KF is 3868 days newer than Xeon E3-1240.
Advantages of Xeon E3-1240
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Core i5-12600KF - 80 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Core i5-12600KF
- Performs up to 53% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Xeon E3-1240 - 697 vs 457 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1240 - 16 vs 8 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
697
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.24/FPS
100%
Price, £
£169.39
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £169.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E3-1240 | vs | Core i5-12600KF |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |