Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms Xeon Bronze 3106 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 2003 days newer than Xeon Bronze 3106.
Advantages of Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 10% better in Battlefield 1 than Xeon Bronze 3106 - 254 vs 231 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon Bronze 3106 - 16 vs 8 threads
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon Bronze 3106
Server/Workstation • Jul 11th, 2017
Core i5-13400F
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon Bronze 3106 | vs | Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| Jul 11th, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| Xeon Bronze | Collection | Core i5 |
| Skylake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 3647 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 8 | Cores | 10 |
| 8 | Threads | 16 |
| 1.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
| 85 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 21.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
