Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12400 outperforms Xeon Bronze 3106 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-12400 is 1638 days newer than Xeon Bronze 3106.
Advantages of Core i5-12400
- Performs up to 58% better in Starfield than Xeon Bronze 3106 - 71 vs 45 FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Xeon Bronze 3106 - 65 vs 85 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon Bronze 3106 - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon Bronze 3106 doesn't have integrated graphics
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
71
100%
Value, £/FPS
£2.04/FPS
100%
Price, £
£145
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £145 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 78 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Jul 11th, 2017
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon Bronze 3106 | vs | Core i5-12400 |
---|---|---|
Jul 11th, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Xeon Bronze | Collection | Core i5 |
Skylake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 3647 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
1.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
85 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
No | Overclockable | No |