Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX outperforms Xeon E5-2699A v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX is 1358 days newer than Xeon E5-2699A v4.
Advantages of Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
- Performs up to 7% better in Lost Ark than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 266 vs 249 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 64 vs 44 threads
Advantages of Xeon E5-2699A v4
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX - 145 vs 280 Watts
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
FPS
266
100%
Value, £/FPS
£7.85/FPS
100%
Price, £
£2087.72
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £2,087.72 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 360 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX | vs | Xeon E5-2699A v4 |
---|---|---|
Jul 14th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 25th, 2016 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Castle Peak | Codename | Broadwell |
AMD Socket WRX8 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 22 |
64 | Threads | 44 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
280 W | TDP | 145 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |