Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-14900 outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-14900 is 1273 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX.
Advantages of Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-14900 - 64 vs 32 threads
Advantages of Core i9-14900
- Performs up to 9% better in Forza Horizon 4 than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX - 344 vs 315 FPS
- Up to 73% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX - £570.81 vs £2087.72
- Up to 75% better value when playing Forza Horizon 4 than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX - £1.66 vs £6.63 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX doesn't have integrated graphics
Forza Horizon 4
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
FPS
315
92%
Value, £/FPS
£6.63/FPS
25%
Price, £
£2087.72
27%
Buy for £2,087.72 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 270 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
344
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.66/FPS
100%
Price, £
£570.81
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £570.81 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 269 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX | vs | Core i9-14900 |
---|---|---|
Jul 14th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i9 |
Castle Peak | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket WRX8 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 24 |
64 | Threads | 32 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
280 W | TDP | Not Available |
7 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | No |