Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-12400 outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-12400 is 1189 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.
Advantages of Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-12400 - 24 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Core i5-12400
- Performs up to 12% better in Battlefield V than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 265 vs 237 FPS
- Up to 52% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - £145.00 vs £300.09
- Up to 57% better value when playing Battlefield V than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - £0.55 vs £1.27 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for £300.09 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 54 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
265
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.55/FPS
100%
Price, £
£145
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £145 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 53 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X | vs | Core i5-12400 |
---|---|---|
Oct 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i5 |
Colfax | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 6 |
24 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 65 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |