Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-14900K outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-14900K is 1840 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.
Advantages of Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Up to 31% cheaper than Core i9-14900K - £300.09 vs £435.39
Advantages of Core i9-14900K
- Performs up to 54% better in Marvel's Spider-Man: Miles Morales than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 179 vs 116 FPS
- Up to 6% better value when playing Marvel's Spider-Man: Miles Morales than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - £2.43 vs £2.59 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 32 vs 24 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Marvel's Spider-Man: Miles Morales
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
116
65%
Value, £/FPS
£2.59/FPS
94%
Price, £
£300.09
100%
Buy for £300.09 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6543 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
179
100%
Value, £/FPS
£2.43/FPS
100%
Price, £
£435.39
68%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £435.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6542 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X | vs | Core i9-14900K |
---|---|---|
Oct 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i9 |
Colfax | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 24 |
24 | Threads | 32 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
180 W | TDP | Not Available |
12 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |