Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12600K outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-12600K is 471 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G.
Advantages of Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
- Up to 23% cheaper than Core i5-12600K - £182.75 vs £236.83
- Up to 13% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-12600K - £1.36 vs £1.56 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i5-12600K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Core i5-12600K
- Performs up to 13% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G - 152 vs 134 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G - 16 vs 12 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2020
FPS
134
88%
Value, £/FPS
£1.36/FPS
100%
Price, £
£182.75
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £182.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8458 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
152
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.56/FPS
87%
Price, £
£236.83
77%
FPS Winner
Buy for £236.83 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8458 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2020
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G | vs | Core i5-12600K |
---|---|---|
Jul 21st, 2020 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Renoir | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 10 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Radeon Vega 7 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |