The Ryzen 3 3200G is at least 2x faster gaming CPU than the Celeron G3930. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Ryzen 3 3200G
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of the Celeron G3930
- Consumes up to 22% less energy – 51 vs 65 Watts
Ryzen 3 3200G vs Celeron G3930 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Ryzen 3 3200G
Jul 7th, 2019
Average FPS
179
100%
Min 1% FPS
119
100%
Price, £
Out of Stock
Value, £/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Celeron G3930
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
170
95%
Min 1% FPS
114
96%
Price, £
£44.99
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.26/FPS
100%
Ryzen 3 3200G vs Celeron G3930 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Ryzen 3 3200G vs Celeron G3930 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Ryzen 3 3200G vs Celeron G3930 in core CPU performance specifications
Ryzen 3 3200G
Jul 7th, 2019
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
4 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
MHz
Celeron G3930
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
2 MB
50%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
81%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Ryzen 3 3200G | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Celeron G3930 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
| Picasso | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 51 W |
| Performance | ||
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.6 GHz | Base Frequency | 2.9 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Frequency | Non-Turbo |
4 MB | L3 Cache | 2 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 | RAM | DDR4 @ 2400 MHz |
| Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
