Key Differences
In short — Core i7-14700K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-14700K is 2478 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Celeron G3930
- Up to 87% cheaper than Core i7-14700K - £44.99 vs £343.97
- Up to 82% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i7-14700K - £0.29 vs £1.61 per FPS
Advantages of Core i7-14700K
- Performs up to 38% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Celeron G3930 - 214 vs 155 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 28 vs 2 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
155
72%
Value, £/FPS
£0.29/FPS
100%
Price, £
£44.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £44.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
214
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.61/FPS
18%
Price, £
£343.97
13%
FPS Winner
Buy for £343.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G3930 | vs | Core i7-14700K |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 20 |
2 | Threads | 28 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
51 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |