Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 5700X3D outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 5700X3D is 2561 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Celeron G3930
- Up to 81% cheaper than Ryzen 7 5700X3D - £44.99 vs £239.56
- Up to 80% better value when playing Halo Infinite than Ryzen 7 5700X3D - £0.29 vs £1.44 per FPS
- Consumes up to 51% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D - 51 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 7 5700X3D
- Performs up to 8% better in Halo Infinite than Celeron G3930 - 166 vs 153 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 16 vs 2 threads
Halo Infinite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
153
92%
Value, £/FPS
£0.29/FPS
100%
Price, £
£44.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £44.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
166
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.44/FPS
20%
Price, £
£239.56
18%
FPS Winner
Buy for £239.56 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G3930 | vs | Ryzen 7 5700X3D |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Not Available |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |