Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12600K outperforms the cheaper Pentium G4400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G4400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-12600K is 2256 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G4400.
Advantages of Pentium G4400
- Up to 73% cheaper than Core i5-12600K - £63.67 vs £238.62
- Up to 66% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-12600K - £0.54 vs £1.57 per FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Core i5-12600K - 54 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Core i5-12600K
- Performs up to 28% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Pentium G4400 - 152 vs 119 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G4400 - 16 vs 2 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
119
78%
Value, £/FPS
£0.54/FPS
100%
Price, £
£63.67
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £63.67 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 179 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
152
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.57/FPS
34%
Price, £
£238.62
26%
FPS Winner
Buy for £238.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 179 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Pentium G4400 | vs | Core i5-12600K |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Pentium | Collection | Core i5 |
Skylake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |