Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13500 outperforms Xeon X5675 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13500 is 4342 days newer than Xeon X5675.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13500
- Performs up to 30% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Xeon X5675 - 151 vs 116 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Xeon X5675 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon X5675 - 20 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon X5675 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
151
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.5/FPS
100%
Price, £
£225.97
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £225.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13461 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Server/Workstation • Feb 14th, 2011
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon X5675 | vs | Intel Core i5-13500 |
---|---|---|
Feb 14th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Xeon | Collection | Core i5 |
Westmere-EP | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 14 |
12 | Threads | 20 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | No |