Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 2600 outperforms Xeon X5675 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 2600 is 2621 days newer than Xeon X5675.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600
- Performs up to 9% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Xeon X5675 - 127 vs 116 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Xeon X5675 - 65 vs 95 Watts
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Xeon X5675
Server/Workstation • Feb 14th, 2011
Ryzen 5 2600
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon X5675 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 14th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
| Xeon | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Westmere-EP | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 6 | Cores | 6 |
| 12 | Threads | 12 |
| 3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| 3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
| 23.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
