Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 2600 outperforms Core i3-4160T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 2600 is 1368 days newer than Core i3-4160T.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600
- Performs up to 3% better in Alan Wake 2 than Core i3-4160T - 109 vs 106 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4160T - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4160T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 2600 - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 2600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Ryzen 5 2600
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Core i3-4160T
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 | vs | Intel Core i3-4160T |
|---|---|---|
Apr 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2014 |
| Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Haswell |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| 3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 65 W | TDP | 35 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
