Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2950X outperforms Xeon X5650 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2950X is 3090 days newer than Xeon X5650.
Advantages of Intel Xeon X5650
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - 95 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
- Performs up to 9% better in Overwatch 2 than Xeon X5650 - 347 vs 319 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon X5650 - 32 vs 12 threads
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Xeon X5650
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon X5650 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2018 |
| Xeon | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Westmere-EP | Codename | Colfax |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 6 | Cores | 16 |
| 12 | Threads | 32 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
