Key Differences
In short — Xeon W3670 outperforms EPYC 7551P on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon W3670 is 2496 days older than EPYC 7551P.
Advantages of Intel Xeon W3670
- Consumes up to 28% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551P - 130 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551P
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon W3670 - 64 vs 12 threads
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Aug 29th, 2010
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W3670 | vs | AMD EPYC 7551P |
---|---|---|
Aug 29th, 2010 | Release Date | Jun 29th, 2017 |
Xeon | Collection | EPYC |
Westmere-EP | Codename | Naples |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3 |
Server | Segment | Server |
6 | Cores | 32 |
12 | Threads | 64 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 180 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |