Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900F outperforms Xeon W3550 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-11900F is 4237 days newer than Xeon W3550.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900F
- Performs up to 47% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Xeon W3550 - 657 vs 447 FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Xeon W3550 - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon W3550 - 16 vs 8 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
657
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.36/FPS
100%
Price, £
£238.88
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £238.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 123 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Aug 9th, 2009
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W3550 | vs | Intel Core i9-11900F |
---|---|---|
Aug 9th, 2009 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Xeon | Collection | Core i9 |
Bloomfield | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 65 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |