Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KS outperforms Xeon W3530 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900KS is 4685 days newer than Xeon W3530.
Advantages of Intel Xeon W3530
- Consumes up to 13% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KS - 130 vs 150 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KS
- Performs up to 24% better in Valheim than Xeon W3530 - 235 vs 189 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon W3530 - 32 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon W3530 doesn't have integrated graphics
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
FPS
235
100%
Value, £/FPS
£2.27/FPS
100%
Price, £
£533.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £533.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 39 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W3530 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900KS |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 12th, 2023 |
Xeon | Collection | Core i9 |
Bloomfield | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 150 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |