Buy on Amazon
£299
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $799
Availability
MSRP in USD: $799
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 5950X outperforms Xeon W-3375 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 5950X is 266 days older than Xeon W-3375.
Advantages of Intel Xeon W-3375
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 9 5950X - 76 vs 32 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 5950X
- Performs up to 6% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Xeon W-3375 - 146 vs 138 FPS
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Xeon W-3375 - 105 vs 270 Watts
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Ryzen 9 5950X
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FPS
146
100%
Value, £/FPS
£2.05/FPS
100%
Price, £
£299
100%
FPS and Value Winner
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X Processor (16Cores/32Threads, 105W TDP, Socket AM4, 72MB Cache, Up to 4.9 GHz Max Boost, no cooler)
Buy for £299 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 131 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Xeon W-3375
Server/Workstation • Jul 29th, 2021
Ryzen 9 5950X
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W-3375 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 5950X |
|---|---|---|
Jul 29th, 2021 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
| Xeon W | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
| Ice Lake | Codename | Vermeer |
| Intel Socket 4189 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
38 | Cores | 16 |
76 | Threads | 32 |
| 2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
| 270 W | TDP | 105 W |
| 10 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 25.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
