Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 5600GT outperforms Xeon W-3375 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 5600GT is 893 days newer than Xeon W-3375.
Advantages of Intel Xeon W-3375
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 5600GT - 76 vs 12 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 5600GT
- Performs up to 4% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Xeon W-3375 - 119 vs 114 FPS
- Consumes up to 76% less energy than Intel Xeon W-3375 - 65 vs 270 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon W-3375 doesn't have integrated graphics
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon W-3375
Server/Workstation • Jul 29th, 2021
Ryzen 5 5600GT
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W-3375 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 5600GT |
|---|---|---|
| Jul 29th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| Xeon W | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Ice Lake | Codename | Not Available |
| Intel Socket 4189 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
38 | Cores | 6 |
76 | Threads | 12 |
| 2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
| 270 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 10 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 25.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 7 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
