Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KS outperforms Xeon W-3175X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900KS is 1443 days newer than Xeon W-3175X.
Advantages of Intel Xeon W-3175X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-13900KS - 56 vs 32 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KS
- Performs up to 28% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Xeon W-3175X - 285 vs 223 FPS
- Consumes up to 41% less energy than Intel Xeon W-3175X - 150 vs 255 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon W-3175X doesn't have integrated graphics
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
FPS
285
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.87/FPS
100%
Price, £
£533.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £533.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 37 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Server/Workstation • Jan 30th, 2019
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W-3175X | vs | Intel Core i9-13900KS |
---|---|---|
Jan 30th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 12th, 2023 |
Xeon W | Collection | Core i9 |
Skylake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 3647 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
28 | Cores | 24 |
56 | Threads | 32 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
255 W | TDP | 150 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |