Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400F outperforms Xeon Silver 4116 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-10400F is 1024 days newer than Xeon Silver 4116.
Advantages of Intel Xeon Silver 4116
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10400F - 24 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Performs up to 34% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Xeon Silver 4116 - 369 vs 276 FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Xeon Silver 4116 - 65 vs 85 Watts
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
369
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.27/FPS
100%
Price, £
£101.31
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £101.31 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 194 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Server/Workstation • Jul 11th, 2017
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon Silver 4116 | vs | Intel Core i5-10400F |
---|---|---|
Jul 11th, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Xeon Silver | Collection | Core i5 |
Skylake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 3647 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 6 |
24 | Threads | 12 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
85 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |