Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600K outperforms Xeon E5645 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13600K is 4578 days newer than Xeon E5645.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5645
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Core i5-13600K - 80 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13600K
- Performs up to 17% better in The Last of Us Part I than Xeon E5645 - 147 vs 126 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5645 - 20 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5645 doesn't have integrated graphics
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
147
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.91/FPS
100%
Price, £
£280.13
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £280.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13574 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5645 | vs | Intel Core i5-13600K |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Xeon | Collection | Core i5 |
Westmere-EP | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 14 |
12 | Threads | 20 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
2.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |