Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 2400G outperforms Xeon E5645 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 2400G is 2890 days newer than Xeon E5645.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
- Performs up to 4% better in World of Tanks than Xeon E5645 - 522 vs 502 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Xeon E5645 - 65 vs 80 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5645 doesn't have integrated graphics
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5645
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Ryzen 5 2400G
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5645 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2400G |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Feb 12th, 2018 |
| Xeon | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Westmere-EP | Codename | Raven Ridge |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 2.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
| 80 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 18.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon RX Vega 11 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
