Key Differences
In short — FX-8300 outperforms Xeon E5645 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-8300 is 952 days newer than Xeon E5645.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5645
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than AMD FX-8300 - 80 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8300 - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-8300
- Performs up to 2% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Xeon E5645 - 115 vs 113 FPS
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Xeon E5645
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
FX-8300
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5645 | vs | AMD FX-8300 |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
| Xeon | Collection | FX |
| Westmere-EP | Codename | Vishera |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
| 2.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 95 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
