Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2620 v3 outperforms FX-8300 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2620 v3 is 685 days newer than FX-8300.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3
- Performs up to 18% better in War Thunder than FX-8300 - 153 vs 130 FPS
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than AMD FX-8300 - 85 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8300 - 12 vs 8 threads
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
FX-8300
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Xeon E5-2620 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8300 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| FX | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Vishera | Codename | Haswell-E |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
8 | Cores | 6 |
| 8 | Threads | 12 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | 85 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 16.5x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
