Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX outperforms Xeon E5530 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX is 3473 days newer than Xeon E5530.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5530
- Consumes up to 68% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - 80 vs 250 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
- Performs up to 13% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Xeon E5530 - 128 vs 113 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5530 - 48 vs 8 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Xeon E5530
Server/Workstation • Mar 30th, 2009
Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
Desktop • Oct 2nd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5530 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 30th, 2009 | Release Date | Oct 2nd, 2018 |
| Xeon | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Gainestown | Codename | Colfax |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 8 | Cores | 24 |
| 8 | Threads | 48 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
| 2.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 250 W |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
| 18.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
